Revenue vs budget
€428,000 +5.7%
Budget €405,000 · services drove the upside
Group reporting & integrations
We design a repeatable monthly process that maps local accounting data to the structure, terminology and timetable used by the parent company — and scope interfaces when data also has to move into existing ERP or reporting systems.
The project starts with the decisions the report has to support, not with a list of software features.
01 · Source
Agreed records and dimensions from the Croatian accounting workflow.
02 · Mapping
A documented bridge from local accounts and fields to the parent's structure.
03 · Controls
Control totals, reconciliations and a visible queue for items that need a decision.
04 · Output
Agreed reports, commentary, format and delivery responsibility.
What can be adapted
A Croatian trial balance is an accounting output. A management package should help an owner or group team see what changed, where attention is needed and which detail sits behind the movement.
Important distinction
This is a custom monthly management and group reporting service. It is not described as statutory consolidation, an audit, an assurance engagement or automatic compliance with a specific reporting standard unless that separate scope has been explicitly established.
A useful group pack does not end with a table. One view shows performance against budget, the exceptions that require attention, who owns the next step and the control trail behind every number.
Adria Services d.o.o. · July · illustrative data
Revenue vs budget
€428,000 +5.7%
Budget €405,000 · services drove the upside
EBITDA
€36,700 8.6% margin
€3,500 above budget after adjustments
Cash
€142,500 +€18,300
Movement compared with the previous month
Overdue receivables
€22,400 attention
12% of receivables more than 60 days overdue
Management commentary: revenue is ahead of budget, but transport and subcontractor spend absorb part of the upside. The next review therefore focuses on supplier rates and project profitability, not only on total sales.
They make up most of the balance over 60 days · owner: local MD · decision: collection plan.
Review the three largest projects · owner: operations · decision: procurement or pricing action.
No intervention; monitor after planned payments and collection of open items.
All names, figures, statuses and deadlines in this example are fictional. The actual content, metrics, control points and format are agreed around the entity, systems and the parent company's template.
Mapping is not a one-off copy into Excel. We document how local accounts, dimensions and exceptions become the parent's structure — and what has to be checked before delivery.
Mapping workbench · illustrative data
The entity, accounts, rules, statuses and outputs shown above are fictional. The actual mapping is built from local data and the parent's approved template.
Data path
The available data, access method, frequency and permitted transfer direction are established before a technical proposal. This separates a reliable process from a vague integration promise.
Standard source
Minimax and other agreed systems provide the data their available functions can expose.
Our project layer
Mapping, transformations, controls, scheduling and exception handling are designed for the specific case.
Parent system
Format, access rights, transfer direction and approval are defined with the owner of the receiving system.
A current workbook, account map or sample group pack is enough to begin. We do not ask for a perfect specification before we understand the decisions and data together.
01 · Discovery
We define what group finance needs to see, when it is due and who approves it.
02 · Design
Sources, transformations, dimensions, exceptions and ownership are documented.
03 · Parallel run
The test output passes control totals and review with the local and group teams.
04 · Operate
Schedule, versions, approvals and escalation become part of recurring delivery.
Commercial scope
Custom reporting, mapping and interface work is contracted separately from the standard accounting package. Price and timing depend on the systems, data volume, transformation rules, controls and agreed support level.
Project brief
You do not need to know the technical solution in advance. Describe the deadline, current report and parent system; we will separate standard accounting, reporting and integration scope.